What Are Pennsylvania’s Bicycle Helmet Laws?
In Pennsylvania, the law requires that certain cyclists wear helmets for their safety. Specifically, riders under the age of 12 are legally required to wear a helmet while riding a bicycle on public roads. For cyclists over the age of 12, wearing a helmet is not mandatory, but it is strongly encouraged. The law was designed with safety in mind, as helmets are proven to reduce the risk of serious head injuries during accidents. While the law is clear about who must wear a helmet, it’s essential to understand that regardless of age, wearing a helmet can be an important factor in any legal case involving a bicycle accident.Why Does Wearing a Helmet Matter in an Accident Claim?
One of the most common questions we receive from cyclists after an accident is whether or not their failure to wear a helmet will impact their claim. The short answer is that it can. While Pennsylvania law does not require adults to wear a helmet, failure to do so may still affect the way insurance companies and courts view your case. In some cases, the insurance company may argue that your failure to wear a helmet contributed to the severity of your injuries. They may use this as a way to reduce the amount of compensation you could receive for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. However, it’s important to remember that just because you weren’t wearing a helmet doesn’t automatically mean you’re at fault or that you can’t receive compensation.Comparative Negligence and How It Affects Your Case
Pennsylvania follows a legal principle known as comparative negligence, which means that if both you and the other party involved in the accident share some level of fault, your compensation can be reduced based on the degree of responsibility you hold. If you weren’t wearing a helmet during the accident, the insurance company may try to claim that your injuries were more severe because of that. This could result in a decrease in the compensation you’re entitled to. However, comparative negligence doesn’t mean you won’t be able to win your case. It simply means that the court will consider how much fault each party has. If the other driver or cyclist was primarily responsible for the accident, your failure to wear a helmet may not have a significant impact on your case. The most crucial element is proving that the other party’s negligence caused the accident.“Highly Recommended” is the epitome of an understatement when it comes to the firm of McDonald At Law!! Michael McDonald’s genuine pleasant, and empathetic demeanor masks his legal astuteness, and the level of aggressiveness he implements in pursuit of a victim’s right and the monetary compensation legally entitled to us. I was involved in a motor vehicle accident at the hands of an intoxicated driver in York County. In my case I suffered what I described as an atypical injury, Mr. McDonald offered to be my Lawyer immediately after explaining to him the events leading to and after being struck in turn causing me to have a heart attack, when another law firm seemed hesitant. McDonald At Law secured a sizable monetary compensation that not only met my expectation but exceeded it. Mr. McDonald’s wealth of experience, and legal prowess is priceless and never did he act as the case was beneath his practice. In the end my family and I were well compensated, but also felt justified. Thank you McDonald At Law!!
- Miguel Lopez
The Importance of Evidence in Bicycle Accident Claims
In any bicycle accident case, gathering evidence is critical. This includes medical records, witness statements, photographs of the scene, and any other documentation that can help support your version of events. When it comes to helmet laws, it’s equally important to have clear evidence about the circumstances surrounding your injury. For example, if you weren’t wearing a helmet at the time of the accident, it’s important to establish that this did not directly cause or worsen your injuries. Medical records showing the severity of your injuries, the type of treatment you received, and the long-term effects can help demonstrate that the cause of your injuries was the accident itself, rather than your choice to ride without a helmet. In some cases, expert testimony may be used to explain how wearing a helmet might have affected the outcome of the accident. This can be important in situations where your injuries were catastrophic, such as traumatic brain injuries, and the other party is trying to argue that your failure to wear a helmet contributed to the severity of your condition.Related Videos
Putting off an Attorney due to Cost
Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney